Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:59:52 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: disable-cap-mlock |
| |
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:48:25AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 03:59:20PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > Oracle needs this sysctl, I designed it and Ken Chen implemented it. I > > guess google also won't dislike it. > > This is a lot simpler than the mlock rlimit and this is people really > > need (not the rlimit). The rlimit thing can still be applied on top of > > this. This should be more efficient too (besides its simplicity). > > can you apply to mainline? > > http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.6/2.6.5-rc3-aa1/disable-cap-mlock-1 > > Something like this would have the minor advantage of zero core impact. > Testbooted only. vs. 2.6.5-rc3-mm4
I certainly like this too (despite it's more complicated but it might avoid us to have to add further sysctl in the future), Andrew what do you prefer to merge? I don't mind either ways. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |