Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:45:39 +0100 | From | "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <> | Subject | Re: ACPI PM Timer vs. C1 halt issue |
| |
john stultz wrote: > On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 13:35, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: > >>I found out what causes higher idle temps when using mm-sources and >>2.6.4-rc vanilla sources: If I use PM Timer as timesource, it seems the >>C1 halt isn't properly called, at least CPU disconnect doesn't seem to >>work, thus leaving my CPU as hot as without disconnect. [snip] > > Sounds like a bug. I'm not very familiar w/ the ACPI cpu power states, > is there anything you have to do to trigger C1 Halt? Or is it just > called in the idle loop?
It should be called within the idle loop.
bye,
Prakash - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |