lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ACPI PM Timer vs. C1 halt issue
john stultz wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 13:35, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
>
>>I found out what causes higher idle temps when using mm-sources and
>>2.6.4-rc vanilla sources: If I use PM Timer as timesource, it seems the
>>C1 halt isn't properly called, at least CPU disconnect doesn't seem to
>>work, thus leaving my CPU as hot as without disconnect.
[snip]
>
> Sounds like a bug. I'm not very familiar w/ the ACPI cpu power states,
> is there anything you have to do to trigger C1 Halt? Or is it just
> called in the idle loop?

It should be called within the idle loop.

bye,

Prakash
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.071 / U:0.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site