lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] barrier patch set
FromChris Mason <>
DateWed, 31 Mar 2004 09:21:35 -0500
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 09:08, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 23:21, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> > For IDE, O_DIRECT and O_SYNC can use special "FUA" commands, which don't 
> > return until the data is on the platter.
> 
> fsync() is still really nasty, because that can require that we wait on
> IO that was submitted by the VM before we knew that there was a
> synchronous IO wait coming.  

Yes, it gets ugly in a hurry.  Jeff, look at the whole thread about the
O_DIRECT read vs buffered write races.  I don't think we can use FUA for
fsync or O_SYNC without using it for every write.

We might be able to get away with using it on O_DIRECT.

-chris


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [from the cache]
©2003-2008