lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] barrier patch set
    From
    Date
    Hi,

    On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 23:13, Chris Mason wrote:

    > Most database benchmarks are done on scsi, and the blkdev_flush should
    > be a noop there. For IDE based database and mail server benchmarks, the
    > results won't be pretty.

    Yep. I'm really not too worried about big database benchmarks -- those
    are very much special cases, using rather specialised storage setup
    (SCSI or FC, striped over lots of small disks rather than fewer large
    ones.) I'm much more concerned about your average LAMP user's mysql
    database, and how to keep performance sane on that.

    > The reiserfs fsync code tries hard to only flush once, so if a commit is
    > done then blkdev_flush isn't called. We might have to do a few other
    > tricks to queue up multiple synchronous ios and only flush once.

    Batching is really helpful when you've got lots of threads that can be
    coalesced, yes. ext3 does that for things like mail servers. I'm not
    sure whether the same tricks will apply to the various databases out
    there, though.

    --Stephen

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.027 / U:0.204 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site