![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote: > > ok, could you try min_interval,max_interval and busy_factor all with a > > value as 4, in sched.h's SD_NODE_INIT template? (again, only for testing > > purposes.) > > I kept the old patch and made these changes. The results are much more > consistent now 3+x CPU. I still get varyations of ~2GB/s, but I had > this with older kernels too. great. now, could you try the following patch, against vanilla -mm5: redhat.com/~mingo/scheduler-patches/sched2.patch this includes 'context balancing' and doesnt touch the NUMA async balancing tunables. Do you get better performance than with stock -mm5? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||