lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 29 Mar 2004 23:38:11 -0800
From"Martin J. Bligh" <>
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3
> Well NUMA balance on exec is obviously the right thing to do.
> 
> Maybe balance on clone would be beneficial if we only balance onto
> CPUs which are idle or very very imbalanced. Basically, if you are
> very sure that it is going to be balanced off anyway, it is probably
> better to do it at clone.

Yup ... sounds utterly sensible. But I think we need to make the current
balance favour grouping threads together on the same CPU/node more first
if possible ;-)

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [from the cache]
©2003-2008