lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 30 Mar 2004 17:18:30 +1000
FromNick Piggin <>
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>Andi, could you please try the patch below - this will test whether this
>>>has to do with the rate of balancing between NUMA nodes. The patch
>>>itself is not correct (it way overbalances on NUMA), but it tests the
>>>theory.
>>
>>This works much better, but wildly varying (my tests go from 2.8xCPU
>>to ~3.8x CPU for 4 CPUs. 2,3 CPU cases are ok). A bit more consistent
>>results would be better though.
> 
> 
> ok, could you try min_interval,max_interval and busy_factor all with a
> value as 4, in sched.h's SD_NODE_INIT template? (again, only for testing
> purposes.)
> 

(sorry, forget what I said then, I'll leave it to Ingo)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [from the cache]
©2003-2008