![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote: > > >>>Andi, could you please try the patch below - this will test whether this >>>has to do with the rate of balancing between NUMA nodes. The patch >>>itself is not correct (it way overbalances on NUMA), but it tests the >>>theory. >> >>This works much better, but wildly varying (my tests go from 2.8xCPU >>to ~3.8x CPU for 4 CPUs. 2,3 CPU cases are ok). A bit more consistent >>results would be better though. > > > ok, could you try min_interval,max_interval and busy_factor all with a > value as 4, in sched.h's SD_NODE_INIT template? (again, only for testing > purposes.) > (sorry, forget what I said then, I'll leave it to Ingo) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||