[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] barrier patch set
On Wednesday 31 of March 2004 00:21, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > Yep. It scares me to think what performance characteristics we'll start
> > seeing once that gets used everywhere it's needed, though. If every raw
> > or O_DIRECT write needs a flush after it, databases are going to become
> > very sensitive to flush performance. I guess disabling the flushing and
> > using disks which tell the truth about data hitting the platter is the
> > sane answer there.
> For IDE, O_DIRECT and O_SYNC can use special "FUA" commands, which don't
> return until the data is on the platter.

Do you know of any drive supporting it? I don't.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.154 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site