lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] barrier patch set
    Date
    On Wednesday 31 of March 2004 00:21, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
    > > Yep. It scares me to think what performance characteristics we'll start
    > > seeing once that gets used everywhere it's needed, though. If every raw
    > > or O_DIRECT write needs a flush after it, databases are going to become
    > > very sensitive to flush performance. I guess disabling the flushing and
    > > using disks which tell the truth about data hitting the platter is the
    > > sane answer there.
    >
    > For IDE, O_DIRECT and O_SYNC can use special "FUA" commands, which don't
    > return until the data is on the platter.

    Do you know of any drive supporting it? I don't.

    Bartlomiej

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.022 / U:61.748 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site