![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Mar 30 2004, Marc Bevand wrote: > On 30 Mar 2004, Jens Axboe wrote: > | On Tue, Mar 30 2004, Marc Bevand wrote: > | [...] > | > As other people were complaining that the 32MB max request size might be too > | > high, I did give a try to 1MB (by replacing "65534" by "2046" in the patch). > | > There is no visible differences between 32MB and 1MB. > | > | As suspected. BTW, you want to use 2048 there, not 2046. The 64K-2 > | (which could be 64K-1) is just due to ->max_sectors being an unsigned > | short currently. > > Okay, I thought the 2 sectors were used to store some extra > informations. > > I also forgot to mention that there does not seem to have any > *latency* differences between 32MB and 1MB. Strange... That's because you are not generating requests that big anyways. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [W:0.049 / U:0.020 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||