lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 30 Mar 2004 11:21:35 +0530
FromManeesh Soni <>
SubjectRe: Unregistering interfaces
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:31:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The module should remain in memory, "unhashed", until the final kobject
> > > reference falls to zero.  Destruction of that kobject causes the refcount
> > > on the module to fall to zero which causes the entire module to be
> > > released.
> > > 
> > > (hmm, the existence of a kobject doesn't appear to contribute to its
> > > module's refcount.  Why not?)
> > 
> > It does, if a file for that kobject is opened.  In this case, there was
> > no file opened, so the module refcount isn't incremented.
> 
> hm, surprised.  Shouldn't the existence of a kobject contribute to its
> module's refcount?
> 
> > > Maybe a shrink_dcache_parent(dentry) on entry to simple_rmdir() would
> > > suffice?
> > 
> > Will that get rid of the references properly nwhen we remove the
> > kobject?
> 
> That's one the dcache guys could address better, but I was mainly proposing
> it as a way of removing any negative dentries.  But it appears that we have
> problems beyond negative dentries?

shrink_dcache_parent() will only free up the zero ref. counted dentries,
positive or negatvie doesnot matter. But we may have some faulty user space
app holding a sysfs file, sysfs directory, corresponding kobject, module etc.
Refer http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1884

(Greg, I am including the reply for other thread also here)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=108059485726012&w=2

Fix for these problems will depend upon the life time rule for
modules Vs kobjects Vs dentries. When and what should die or live?

I am not very clear about how the first two behave. Still I can think
of a solution within sysfs like this as Alen suggested. But again I am not 
very sure if this can be done properly without any races. But anyway I am 
trying.

1) backout my patch sysfs-pin-kobject.patch
2) handle NULL d_fsdata while trying to access the corresponding kobject
   for an attribute file.

Maneesh
-- 
Maneesh Soni
Linux Technology Center, 
IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India
email: maneesh@in.ibm.com
Phone: 91-80-25044999 Fax: 91-80-25268553
T/L : 9243696
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [W:0.812 / U:0.050 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans