![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wednesday 03 Mar 2004 4:31 pm, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > We have two sets of kgdb patches as of now: [core-lite, i386-lite, 8250] > > and [core, i386, ppc, x86_64, eth]. First set of kgdb patches (lite) is > > fairly clean. Let's consider it to be a candicate for submission to > > mainline kernel. > > There may be better way to get kgdb into mainline. > > AFAICS, mainline already contains kgdb/ppc. Submiting "core-lite, > ppc-lite, 8250" would then be simply much needed cleanup. We can push > i386 few days after that. ppc.patch removes arch/ppc/kernel/ppc-stub.c and adds a new file kgdb.c I think that has a greater rejection chance. Let's not change the direction now. Some time ago there was another view that x86_64 would be easier. We have already had sufficient headache because of split -lite -heavy patches. Let's try to finish that asap. -Amit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||