Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3 | From | Felipe Alfaro Solana <> | Date | Wed, 03 Mar 2004 11:19:01 +0100 |
| |
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 10:59, Robin Rosenberg wrote: > On Wednesday 03 March 2004 10:43, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > > But XFS easily breaks down due to media defects. Once ago I used XFS, > > but I lost all data on one of my volumes due to a bad block on my hard > > disk. XFS was unable to recover from the error, and the XFS recovery > > tools were unable to deal with the error. > > What file systems work on defect media?
It's not a matter of working: it's a matter of recovering. A bad disk block could potentially destroy a file or a directory, but shouldn't make a filesystem not mountable nor recoverable.
> As for crashed disks I rarely bothered trying to "fix" them anymore. I save > what I can and restore what's backed up and recovery tools (other than > the undo-delete ones) usually destroy what's left, but that's not unique to > XFS. Depending on how good my backups are I sometimes try the recovery > tools just to see, but that has never helped so far.
The problem is that I couldn't save anything: the XFS volume refused to mount and the XFS recovery tools refused to fix anything. It was just a single disk bad block. For example in ext2/3 critical parts are replicated several times over the volume, so there's minimal chance of being unable to mount the volume and recover important files.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |