Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:16:09 +0100 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: 230-objrmap fixes for 2.6.3-mjb2 |
| |
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:39:35PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > what we do in 2.4 and that works pretty well, that is simply to refile > > pages into the active list if they're mlocked, so we don't waste too > > much cpu on them since we don't analyze them too often. this should work > > pretty well for everybody, or peraphs google may prefer to have a fully > > consistent PG_mlocked. > > If the page is actually mlocked, wouldn't it make more sense to remove > it from both the active and inactive lists altogether? Scanning it seems > like it'd be less than fruitful.
yes, that's probably better, but the brainer part of the code is probably the same as for maintaining the bitflag. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |