![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wednesday 03 Mar 2004 6:38 am, George Anzinger wrote: > Amit S. Kale wrote:> > OK to checkin.> >> > -Amit> >> > On Saturday 28 Feb 2004 3:24 am, Tom Rini wrote:> >>Hello. When we use kgdboe, we can't use it until do_basic_setup() is > >> done. So we have two options, not allow kgdboe to use the initial > >> breakpoint or move debugger_entry() to be past the point where kgdboe > >> will be usable. I've opted for the latter, as if an earlier breakpoint > >> is needed you can still use serial and throw> >> kgdb_schedule_breakpoint/breakpoint where desired.> >>> >>--- linux-2.6.3-rc4/init/main.c 2004-02-17 09:51:19.000000000 -0700 > >>+++ linux-2.6.3-rc4-kgdb/init/main.c 2004-02-17 11:33:51.854388988 -0700 > >>@@ -581,6 +582,7 @@ static int init(void * unused)> >>> >> smp_init(); > >> do_basic_setup(); > >>+ debugger_entry();>> It would be nice to not need this. Could it be a side effect of > configuring the interface or some such so we don't have to patch > init/main.c I attempted doing this when I was trying to code a netpoll independent ethernet interface. I couldn't do without it. I needed one hook to kgdb in init to mark completion of smp_init. If an interface was ready, that hook called breakpoint. A similar hook was placed in interface initialization code, it called breakpoint, if kgdb core was ready on account of smp_init completion. -Amit > -g>> >> prepare_namespace();> >> > -> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" > > in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||