lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 230-objrmap fixes for 2.6.3-mjb2
    --Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote (on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 02:58:20 -0800):

    > Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote:
    >>
    >> --- sles-objrmap/mm/rmap.c.~1~ 2004-03-03 06:45:38.995594456 +0100
    >> +++ sles-objrmap/mm/rmap.c 2004-03-03 07:01:39.200621104 +0100
    >> @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ try_to_unmap_obj_one(struct vm_area_stru
    >> if (!pte)
    >> goto out;
    >>
    >> - if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
    >> + if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_LOCKED|VM_RESERVED)) {
    >> ret = SWAP_FAIL;
    >> goto out_unmap;
    >
    > I keep on wanting to put that in there too. But pages in a VM_RESERVED vma
    > should not find their way onto the LRU. Maybe we should be checking for
    > that in do_no_page().

    There was talk at one point of moving the "unswappable" state down into
    the struct page. Is that still realistic? It would seem rather more
    efficient, but I forget what problem we ran into with it.

    M.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.027 / U:3.800 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site