Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] speed up SATA | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:05:36 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 14:44, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29 2004, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > Jens Axboe wrote: > > > Could be used to limit tcq depth, not just request sizes solving two > > > problems at once. I already have a tiny bit of keeping this > > > accounting to do proper unplugs (right now it just looks at missing > > > requests from the pool, doesn't work on tcq). > > > > Does it make sense to allow different numbers of outstanding TCQ-reads > > and TCQ-writes? > > Might not be a silly thing to experiment with, definitely something that > should be tested (added to list...)
I wonder if the max read size could/should be correlated with the readahead size for such devices... it sounds like a related property at least.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |