lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] speed up SATA
From
Date
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 14:44, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29 2004, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Could be used to limit tcq depth, not just request sizes solving two
> > > problems at once. I already have a tiny bit of keeping this
> > > accounting to do proper unplugs (right now it just looks at missing
> > > requests from the pool, doesn't work on tcq).
> >
> > Does it make sense to allow different numbers of outstanding TCQ-reads
> > and TCQ-writes?
>
> Might not be a silly thing to experiment with, definitely something that
> should be tested (added to list...)

I wonder if the max read size could/should be correlated with the
readahead size for such devices... it sounds like a related property at
least.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.115 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site