[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] nodemask_t x86_64 changes [5/7]
    On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:08:46PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
    > For big endian, ~0UL << NR_CPUS_UNDEF is right. For little endian, it
    > depends on how you represent an incomplete bit map. Is it represented
    > as a pure bit string, i.e. as if the arch were big endian? Or is it
    > represented as a mapping onto the bytes of the underlying long?

    Bitmaps are represented in Linux in such manners as befit wrong
    (little) endian machines. I suggest shifting in the opposite direction.

    -- wli
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.018 / U:44.976 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site