[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] nodemask_t x86_64 changes [5/7]
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:08:46PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> For big endian, ~0UL << NR_CPUS_UNDEF is right. For little endian, it
> depends on how you represent an incomplete bit map. Is it represented
> as a pure bit string, i.e. as if the arch were big endian? Or is it
> represented as a mapping onto the bytes of the underlying long?

Bitmaps are represented in Linux in such manners as befit wrong
(little) endian machines. I suggest shifting in the opposite direction.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.039 / U:1.592 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site