![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:20:12 +1000 Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > I ported it by hand to the -mm4 scheduler now and tested it. While > > it works marginally better than the standard -mm scheduler > > (you get 1 1/2 the bandwidth of one CPU instead of one) it's still > > still much worse than the optimum of nearly 4 CPUs archived by > > 2.4 or the standard scheduler. > > > Sorry ignore this report - I just found out I booted the wrong kernel by mistake. Currently retesting, also with the proposed change to only use a single scheduling domain. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||