lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 29 Mar 2004 07:07:52 +0200
FromAndi Kleen <>
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:20:58 -0800
Rick Lindsley <ricklind@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> I've got a web page up now on my home machine which shows data from
> schedstats across the various flavors of 2.6.4 and 2.6.5-rc2 under
> load from kernbench, SPECjbb, and SPECdet.
> 
>     http://eaglet.rain.com/rick/linux/sched-domain/index.html
> 
> Two things that stand out are that sched-domains tends to call
> load_balance() less frequently when it is idle and more frequently when
> it is busy (as compared to the "standard" scheduler.)  Another is that
> even though it moves fewer tasks on average, the sched-domains code shows
> about half of pull_task()'s work is coming from active_load_balance() ...
> and that seems wrong.  Could these be contributing to what you're seeing?

Sounds quite possible yes.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [from the cache]
©2003-2008