![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andi Kleen wrote: > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:46:35 +0200 > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > >>* Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote: >> >> >>>Sorry ignore this report - I just found out I booted the wrong kernel >>>by mistake. Currently retesting, also with the proposed change to only >>>use a single scheduling domain. >> >>here are the items that are in the works: >> >> redhat.com/~mingo/scheduler-patches/sched.patch >> >>it's against 2.6.5-rc2-mm5. This patch also reduces the rate of active >>balancing a bit. > > > I applied only this patch and it did slightly better than the normal -mm* > 1.5 - 2x CPU bandwidth, but still very short of the 3.7x-4x mainline > and 2.4 reach. So both -mm5 and Ingo's sched.patch are much worse than what 2.4 and 2.6 get? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||