Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:18:06 +0200 | From | Marc Giger <> | Subject | Re: status of Linux on Alpha? |
| |
Hi Ivan, Hi Måns
I haven't found the time to look deeper into the problem. All what I can say ATM is, it is real and exists!
Ivan, perhaps you can give me some useful advise how to debug this successfully? I think we should begin to try isolating the problem to a single part of the kernel. Is it possible that we have a deadlock in the VFS part? After a while every process that accesses a file will be blocked (already described).
Regards
Marc
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:43:08 +0400 Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 06:19:10PM +0200, Måns Rullgård wrote: > > Well, I'm using both raid and xfs... > > OK, good to know. > > > So you're saying that if 2.6.3 is stable, 2.6.4 and later should be > > fine too? > > I haven't tried 2.6.5 yet, but with 2.6.4 couple of my boxes have > 16 days uptime and no problems so far. > > Ivan. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |