lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
Hi Dumitru.

>>/*
>> This file is under the GPL, yada yada
>>*/
>>#include "things.h"
>>
>>void some_func(void)
>>{
>> does_something();
>>}
>>
>>char firmware[]={0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07};
>>
>>void upload_firmware(void)
>>{
>> do_upload(firmware);
>>}
>>
>>--
>>
>>Then it seems clear to me that the firmware is under the GPL because it
>>is PART of the GPL'd file.
>
>
>
> If you're right, then the "binary" of the firmware it's GPL, not the
> source of the firmware, because that's what you have in this case :)
>
> You can have that ? GPL the binary but not the source ? :)

Not as far as I know, you can't put the resulting binary under a
different license than the source, but hey, IANAL :)

That would make all sorts of nasty implications if it was possible.

// Stefan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.095 / U:1.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site