[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Broken PM semantics (WAS: PATCH: Shutdown IDE before powering off).

    > > Thus wrote Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz:
    > > >
    > > > On Thursday 22 of January 2004 17:02, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > > > I'm either shock or very very worried that the reboot notifier that
    > > > > flushes IDE in 2.4.x, ide_notifier, is nowhere to be seen in 2.6.x :(
    > > > > That seems like the real problem -- the code _used_ to be there.
    > > >
    > > > Yep, it should be re-added. I wonder when/why it was removed?
    > Ideally, it should use the same mecanism as the PM requests...
    > In fact, the shutdown is just a special case of PM request. I think
    > ultimately, we should drop the various "shutdown()" functions in the
    > drivers in favor of a "state" selector for PM. That goes along with
    > the current problem of "state" in PM beeing completely bogus. The
    > constants defined by linux/pm.h are in no way related to what
    > the various drivers have come to expect.
    > enum {
    > };
    > Which basically gives is MEM=2 and DISK=3, while drivers usually
    > expect MEM=3 and DISK=4 while nobody really cares about 2 except
    > some specific stuffs in the arch code (or radeonfb on pmacs...)
    > We should get rid of this assumption that we are passing a D-type
    > anyway. I suggest we define once for all that what we are passing
    > down the driver is really the overall system state we are getting
    > to, that is MEM,DISK,KEXEC,SHUTDOWN, eventually STANDBY if we
    > ever do something like that (useful for handhelds that have a
    > special idle state and really don't care about scheduling whne
    > nothing happens for a while).

    Agreed. Or at least document that it takes D states
    and BUG-ON on invalid values...
    64 bytes from icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.021 / U:4.760 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site