Messages in this thread | | | From | "Chen, Kenneth W" <> | Subject | RE: add lowpower_idle sysctl | Date | Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:20:58 -0800 |
| |
>>>>> Todd Poynor wrote on Thu, March 18, 2004 3:00 PM > I'd vote for using Patrick Mochel's PM subsystem and use a standard > set of identifiers that are mapped to a platform-specific idle behavior, > in much the same way as platform suspend modes are handled today. For > example, strings echoed to /sys/power/idle could be an interface. If > folks are amenable to this I'd be happy to supply a (generic) patch for it.
Just wondering what is the state of development for this new PM scheme? I don't check LKML that frequently, sorry if I miss any posting on LKML.
- Ken
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |