lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]
Hi!

> >>So why aren't you arguing against bootsplash too? That definitely
> >>obscures such an error :> Of course we could argue that such an error
> >>shouldn't happen and/or will be obvious via other means (assuming it
> >>indicates hardware failure).
> >
> >Of course I *am* against bootsplash. Unfortunately I've probably lost
> >that war already. But at least it is not in -linus tree (and that's
> >what I use anyway) => I gave up with bootsplash-equivalents, as long
> >as they don't come to linus.
> >
> >[And I believe Linus would shoot down bootsplash-like code, anyway.]
>
> Solution: Auto switch to non-swsusp VT on error showing the error message.

Hmm, at that point you loose context, like now you know what error
happened, but do not know at which phase of suspend. That's pretty bad
too.
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site