Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:41:10 -0500 (EST) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Non-Exec stack patches |
| |
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Now, what should the kernel do if the executable requests > EXSTACK_DISABLE_X but the kernel cannot do that? Is it not a bit > misleading/dangerous to permit the executable to run anyway?
it's not really a problem. We already ignore the !X bit on x86.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |