Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:09:56 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads |
| |
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:51:11AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> I may have missed one of his posts where he gave the results from the >> RT test suite. I found a list of functions with some kind of numbers, >> though I didn't see a description of what those numbers were and was >> looking for something more detailed (e.g. the output of the RT >> instrumentation things he had with and without preempt). This is all >> mostly curiosity and sort of hoping this gets carried out vaguely >> scientifically anyway, so I'm not really arguing one way or the other.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 04:03:11PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > agreed. what I've seen so far is a great number of graphs, they were > scientific enough for my needs and covering real life different > workloads, but I'm not sure what Takashi published exactly, you may want > to discuss it with him.
I didn't see the graphs; they may be helpful for my purposes.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |