Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:25:17 +0100 | From | "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <> | Subject | Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1 |
| |
Ross Dickson wrote: > On Saturday 20 March 2004 19:29, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: > >>Len Brown wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 14:22, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hmm, I just did a cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power: >>>>active state: C1 >>>>default state: C1 >>>>bus master activity: 00000000 >>>>states: >>>> *C1: promotion[--] demotion[--] latency[000] >>>>usage[00000000] >>>> C2: <not supported> >>>> C3: <not supported> >>>> >>>>I am currently NOT using APIC mode (nforce2, as well) and using vanilla >>>>2.6.4. It seems C1 halt state isn't used, which exlains why I am having >> >>[snip] >> >>> >>>Actually I think it is that we don't _count_ C1 usage. >> >>Hmm, OK, then I am really puzzled what specifically about mm sources >>make my idle temps hotter, as I still couldn't properly resolve it what >>is causing it. I thought ACPI, but no, using APM only does the same (apm >>only with vanilla is low temp though.) > > > Have you seen this thread, it may be relevant? > Re: [2.6.4-rc2] bogus semicolon behind if() > http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2004-03/4170.html
Hi Ross, I don't think so, as I currently don't use APIC and thus fix in above post wouldn't help me. Or should I read further?
cya,
Prakash
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |