[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1
    Ross Dickson wrote:
    > On Saturday 20 March 2004 19:29, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
    >>Len Brown wrote:
    >>>On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 14:22, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
    >>>>Hmm, I just did a cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power:
    >>>>active state: C1
    >>>>default state: C1
    >>>>bus master activity: 00000000
    >>>> *C1: promotion[--] demotion[--] latency[000]
    >>>> C2: <not supported>
    >>>> C3: <not supported>
    >>>>I am currently NOT using APIC mode (nforce2, as well) and using vanilla
    >>>>2.6.4. It seems C1 halt state isn't used, which exlains why I am having
    >>>Actually I think it is that we don't _count_ C1 usage.
    >>Hmm, OK, then I am really puzzled what specifically about mm sources
    >>make my idle temps hotter, as I still couldn't properly resolve it what
    >>is causing it. I thought ACPI, but no, using APM only does the same (apm
    >>only with vanilla is low temp though.)
    > Have you seen this thread, it may be relevant?
    > Re: [2.6.4-rc2] bogus semicolon behind if()

    Hi Ross, I don't think so, as I currently don't use APIC and thus fix in
    above post wouldn't help me. Or should I read further?



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.022 / U:46.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site