![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 10:38:03AM +1100, Peter Williams wrote: > >there is one. Nothing uses it > >(sysconf() provides this info) > > Seems to me that it would be fairly trivial to modify those programs > (that should use this mechanism but don't) to use it? So why should > they be allowed to dictate kernel behaviour? quality of implementation; for example shell scripts that want to do echo 500 > /proc/sys/foo/bar/something_in_HZ ... or /etc/sysctl.conf or ... [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01 [W:0.305 / U:0.160 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||