lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 20 Mar 2004 11:19:30 +0100
FromJens Axboe <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] barrier patch set
On Sat, Mar 20 2004, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >I agree with Bart, it's usually never that clear. Quit harping the
> >stupid LG issue, they did something brain dead in the firmware and I
> >almost have to say that they got what they deserved for doing something
> >as _stupid_ as that.
> 
> I use it because it's an excellent illustration of what happens when you 
> ignore the spec.

Really, I think it's a much better demonstration of exactly how stupid
hardware developers are at times...

> >Jeff, it's wonderful to think that you can always rely on checking spec
> >bits, but in reality it never really 'just works out' for any given set
> >of hardware.
> 
> "just issue it and hope" is not a reasonable plan, IMO.

I agree with that as well. I just didn't agree with your rosy idea of
thinking everything would always work if you just check the bits
according to spec.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01    [W:0.663 / U:0.650 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans