Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:19:05 +0100 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] anobjrmap 1/6 objrmap |
| |
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 07:56:37AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > I'm working on my code yes, I think my code is finished, I prefer my > > design for the various reasons explained in the other emails (you don't > > swap so you can't appreciate the benefits, you only have to check that > > performs as well as Hugh's code). > > > > Hugh's and your code is unstable in objrmap, you can find the details in > > the email I sent to Hugh, mine is stable (running such simulation for a > > few days just fine on 4-way xeon, without my objrmap fixes it live locks > > as soon as it hits swap). > > > > You find my anon_vma in 2.6.5-rc1aa2, it's rock solid, just apply the > > whole patch and compare it with your other below results. thanks. > > Mmmm, if you have a broken out patch, it'd be preferable. If I were to > apply the whole of -mjb, I'll get a damned sight better results than > any of them, but that's not really a fair comparison ;-) I'll can at > least check it's stable for me that way though. > > I did find your broken-out anon-vma patch, but it's against something > else, maybe half-way up your tree or something, and I didn't bother > trying to fix it ;-)
this one is against mainline, but you must use my objrmap patch too which is fixed so it doesn't crash in 2.6.5-rc1.
http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.6/2.6.5-rc1-aa2/00100_objrmap-core-1.gz http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.6/2.6.5-rc1-aa2/00101_anon_vma-2.gz
just backout your objrmap and apply the above two, it should apply pretty well. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |