lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH] Kill kgdb_serial
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:31:43PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > > Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >Hello. The following interdiff kills kgdb_serial in favor of function
> > > >names. This only adds a weak function for kgdb_flush_io, and documents
> > > >when it would need to be provided.
> > >
> > > It looks like you are also dumping any notion of building a kernel that can
> > > choose which method of communication to use for kgdb at run time. Is this
> > > so?
> >
> > Yes, as this is how Andrew suggested we do it. It becomes quite ugly if
> > you try and allow for any 2 of 3 methods.
>
> I do not think that having kgdb_serial is so ugly. Are there any other
> uglyness associated with that?

More precisely:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/2/11/224

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.168 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site