lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: poll() in 2.6 and beyond
From
Date
    Bill> Could you maybe go back to the initial report, which is that
Bill> after poll() gets wrong status? It's nice to argue about
Bill> where the process waits, but the issue is if it gets the
Bill> same status with 2.4 and 2.6, and if not which one should be
Bill> fixed.

I'm sure the problem is a buggy driver. The original question
represents a complete misunderstanding of how poll() is implemented,
so it's no surprise that the driver breaks.

- Roland



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:2.792 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site