Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: poll() in 2.6 and beyond | From | Roland Dreier <> | Date | 02 Mar 2004 14:57:15 -0800 |
| |
Bill> Could you maybe go back to the initial report, which is that Bill> after poll() gets wrong status? It's nice to argue about Bill> where the process waits, but the issue is if it gets the Bill> same status with 2.4 and 2.6, and if not which one should be Bill> fixed.
I'm sure the problem is a buggy driver. The original question represents a complete misunderstanding of how poll() is implemented, so it's no surprise that the driver breaks.
- Roland
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |