![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Kevin Corry <kevcorry@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Changing down_read() in dm_any_congested to down_read_trylock() would > > probably fix it for bdi_*_congested(). If you can tell me how to > > reproduce it I can try a few things.. > > Switching to down_read_trylock() would certainly eliminate this problem, as > long as you don't *need* to check the congestion of the underlying devices > each time dm_any_congested() is called. It's clear from the trace: we're doing down_read() inside sync_sb_inodes()'s inode_lock. Yes, a trylock would fix it up, but it's a bit sleazy. And we might have another problem here: we're thnking about removing the global plugging queue and switching disk plugging over to being a per-address_space thing. So blk_run_queues() goes away and is replaced with mapping->backing_dev_info.unplug(&mapping->backing_dev_info); so we only unplug the queues which back the relevant address_space. The top-level code will take the top-level queue's lock, and the devicemapper's implementation of backing_dev_info.unplug() will be called under the top-level queue lock and will need to perform the same devicemapper table walk. A trylock here will not be acceptable: if it fails, a process hangs up for seconds or even minutes. So for two reasons now, it's looking like that semaphore which protects the devicemapper tables needs to become a spinlock. One which has interesting ranking properties. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||