[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] barrier patch set
    Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
    > On Saturday 20 of March 2004 02:48, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
    > > hdparm -i and -I ultimately both interpret WIN_IDENTIFY result, and both
    > > test bit 0x0020 of word 85. So it's unclear to me why they report a
    > > different write cache setting. I added a hexdump to dump_identity()
    > > in hdparm.c, and found that bit 0x0020 of word 85 is always set.
    > or WIN_PIDENTIFY to be strict but
    > -i returns _cached_ (read when the device was probed) identify data
    > (uses HDIO_GET_IDENTIFY ioctl)
    > -I reads _current_ data directly from the device
    > (uses HDIO_DRIVE_CMD ioctl)

    Oh, right.

    But: HDIO_GET_IDENTITY returns drive->id, and surely drive->id
    is used internally. So isn't it a bug that drive->id is not
    updated when the write cache setting is changed?

    I think the barrier code uses drive->id to determine if the
    write cache is enabled.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.020 / U:78.828 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site