lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Active defragmentation : A replacement for bigphysarea?

--- Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Alok Mooley wrote:
> > I have implemented a memory defragmentation
> utility
> > for linux kernel 2.6 based on the paper by Mr.
> Daniel
> > Phillips.
>
> That's very interesting, but:
> 1) what is your name, "Alok Mooley" or "Vijay
> Agashe" ? ;)
We both are part of a project group of 4 students. We
both had posted separate mails because one was
rejected due to the mail being in html (or so the
person at linux-kernel said).

> 2) could we please see your code, so we can try to
> answer
> your questions ?
>
> > Can this utility be used instead of the
> bigphysarea
> > patch, for requirements less than MAX_ORDER of
> > allocation ?
>
> This question is really hard to answer without
> seeing the
> code.

The code will be posted by this month end.

-Alok

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site