![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
I have a different issue with setting cpu affinity. Has anyone considered a "soft" affinity? I'm thinking of the case where I want to run processes on separate cpus for performance reasons, but in the case that one cpu becomes unavailable (physically removed, hardware fault, etc.) I would like to move those processes back to working cpus (except for maybe the one that was actually running and therefore might be corrupted). In this case a reduced performance might be preferable to an unplanned failover to backup hardware. Has this scenario been considered, or will cpu affinity be a "hard" setting. Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||