[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Active defragmentation : A replacement for bigphysarea?
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 09:36, Alok Mooley wrote:
> I have implemented a memory defragmentation utility
> for linux kernel 2.6 based on the paper by Mr. Daniel
> Phillips.
> Can this utility be used instead of the bigphysarea
> patch, for requirements less than MAX_ORDER of
> allocation ?
> Can the people using the bigphysarea patch kindly
> provide me with their respective memory requirements.

Have you incorporated any of the suggestions from the last time that you
posted the patch? Could you post the current version?

-- dave

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.044 / U:43.052 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site