![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 10:28, Takashi Iwai wrote: Hi, Takashi Iwai. > well, i personally am not against the current preempt mechanism from > the viewpoint of the audio-processing purpose :) the implementation > is relatively clean and easy. Agreed. > i think the first one is needed for preemptive kernel, too. > with these patches, also 0.1-0.2ms RT-latency is achieved. Ohh, interesting. I'll give these a spin with PREEMPT=y and see. Thank you! Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||