![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi! > Just wanting clarification; what are we thinking about the future of > suspend implementations? Let me throw my current > understanding/suggestion in for starters: I'd like to know the results, too. > - Drop PM_DISK? I do not care which one is dropped as long as only one implementation remains. Droping PM_DISK is indeed easiest as noone touched it for half a year. > - Apply patches making swsusp into suspend2, leaving out freezer changes > until people are convinced the current solution is insufficient. Could you prepare some "swsusp2 without freezer" patch, so that we can see how it looks like? > - Pavel keeps maintaining the end result? (I'm happy to maintain it if > he wants; I'm assuming when I say this he'll still be dealing with S3 > and Patrick will be deal with PM support proper). I do not think Patrick is going to maintain anything. If you want to maintain it, you can have it. Big plus if you are able to deal with Patrick. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||