Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:37:45 +0800 (WST) | From | Ian Kent <> | Subject | Re: unionfs |
| |
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, [iso-8859-1] Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Mon, 15 March 2004 20:47:05 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, [iso-8859-1] Jörn Engel wrote: > > > > > > You could also have some sort of 'hidden symlink', i.e. something that > > > behaves just like a file but is in fact a link to some other > > > filesystem. If that other filesystem is not accessable, all > > > operations return -EIO. > > > > Sounds a bit untidy. > > If you have a cleaner idea, I'm open for suggestions. > > > Has anyone checked http://www.filesystems.org/ > > > > What do you think? > > Looks like an abstraction layer that still assumes a 1:1 mapping > between filesystems and devices, so it doesn't help. Did I miss > something?
There was talk on the mailing list that they were close to releasing a unionfs filesystem for their fistgen generator. But it has been a while and still nothing.
Ian
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |