Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:54:14 -0800 | From | Johannes Erdfelt <> | Subject | Re: PATCH - InfiniBand Access Layer (IBAL) |
| |
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:44:25PM -0800, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > > > From looking at both codebases starting from scratch sounds like the > > > best idea to me.. > > > > What's fatally wrong with the code that's currently available via > > openib.org? > > Did you actually read it?
The code on openib.org? Yes, I wrote some of it.
I would be the first to say that there are portions that need to be rewritten, but I definately do not think all or even most of it does.
That's why I was asking what specifically you found fatally wrong with it. I haven't seen many critiques, so I can only assume it's the same things I see wrong with it.
> p.s. if you reply to my mails please keep me in the To line. Really, > please don't do any fany reply to group tricks unless people explicitly > request it in the Mail-Fup header.
If you really want duplicates of all the replies, sure, I'll make an exception for you.
I don't see why a smarter client, or mail filter, couldn't do the same thing without depending on the behaviour of the sender.
JE
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |