lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] different proposal for mq_notify(SIGEV_THREAD)
Jamie Lokier wrote:

>The difference is that your proposal eliminates those fds.
>But there is no reason that I can see why mq_notify() should be
>optimised in this way and futexes not.
>
>
I would start with message queues, but the mechanism must be generic
enough to be used for futexes, etc.

The main open question is if I should write something new or if I can
reuse netlink.

--
Manfred

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.059 / U:1.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site