Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:57:48 +0100 | From | Manfred Spraul <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] different proposal for mq_notify(SIGEV_THREAD) |
| |
Jamie Lokier wrote:
>The difference is that your proposal eliminates those fds. >But there is no reason that I can see why mq_notify() should be >optimised in this way and futexes not. > > I would start with message queues, but the mechanism must be generic enough to be used for futexes, etc.
The main open question is if I should write something new or if I can reuse netlink.
-- Manfred
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |