Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:49:24 -0600 | From | Brian King <> | Subject | Re: Question on MODULE_VERSION macro |
| |
Looks like the MODULE_VERSION macro is now in the tree. Greg, any status on the sysfs patch you mention below?
thanks,
Brian
Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:57:38AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > >>In message <20040119214233.GF967@beaverton.ibm.com> you write: >> >>>Rusty, >>> Christoph mentioned that a MODULE_VERSION macro may be pending. >> >>Hey, thanks Christoph for the reminder. I stopped when we were >>frozen. >> >>This still seems to apply. Do people think this is huge overkill, or >>a work of obvious beauty and genius? > > > Looks sane. I'm guessing that modinfo can show this? > > >>Doesn't put things in sysfs, but Greg was working on that for module >>parameters... Greg? > > > Oh yeah, I'll dig out that patch later this week. An older version has > been sitting in my bk tree forever, need to update it with the last > changes you sent me. > > thanks, > > greg k-h >
-- Brian King eServer Storage I/O IBM Linux Technology Center
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |