Messages in this thread |  | | | From | Andrew Haley <> | | Date | Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:29:43 +0000 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' |
| |
Richard Henderson writes: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:43:10AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Ok, let's try just stripping the "const" out of the min/max macros, and > > see what complains. > > I remember what complains. You get actual errors from > > const int x; > int y; > min(x, y);
Can you explain *why* we have to produce a diagnostic for "const const int" by default?
Can't we dispatch such things to "-pedantic" ? Or treat "const const" like "long long" used to be, a gcc extension?
Andrew. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |