lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 01 Mar 2004 01:47:42 -0800
FromMike Fedyk <>
SubjectRe: MM VM patches was: 2.6.3-mm4
Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> 
> Mike Fedyk wrote:
>> So, I'll merge up 2.6.3 + "vm of rc1-mm1" and tell you guys what I see.
>>
> 
> I'm not so hopeful for you anymore :P

These patches apply with only a few offsets if you apply them like in 
the series file, so there's not much work for either of us in applying 
these patches (unless I need to test without a dependent patch or 
something obvious like that...)

> 
>> Are the graphs helpful at all?
>>
> 
> 
> My eyes! The goggles, they do nothing!
> 

Heh.

> They have a lot of good info but I'm a bit hard pressed working
> out what kernel is running where

Suffice it to say, 2.6.3 is the begining of week9, and 2.6.3-lofft-mm4vm 
is the end of week9.  The graphs weren't meant to keep secondary 
information like kernel version...

> and it's a bit hard working out
> all the shades of blue on my crappy little monitor.

Yeah, I see what you mean.  The code in the lrrd/munin project controls 
what colors come in what order, but I can control what order the info is 
output in...

> But if they were easier to read I reckon they'd be useful ;)

I'd like for that to be true especially since I rewrote the memory 
plugin for munin to graph as much as was exported to userspace from the 
Linux kernel...

Did I miss anything? ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2008