![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:50:09AM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > Not unless we can think of a way in which it actually matters, thanks. > > What I'm struggling with when reading that POSIX draft is to > understand whether CLONE_FILES is appropriate or not for > pthread_create. > > If this is unspecified, the f_pos issue becomes largely academic, > although one might argue that read() should behave either one > way or the other. > > And no, luckily, I don't have a real-life application for this > either :-) WTF does that have to CLONE_FILES? Whether you share descriptor table or get an independent copy, pointers to struct file are the same. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:00 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||