![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > Well... it's the sort of problem that's very Schrodenger unless you have > another thread/process observing. In a way :-) What I meant was that the section on read() is worded carefully to avoid making such assurances, but then we find such a broad statement at the end of a section discussing specifically threads (and not even concurrency in general, and after pointing out that threads are optional). - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:00 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||