lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Load balancing problem in 2.6.2-mm1
Date
From
    Yep. I've argued for fairness here, and that is presently what
we get. Between nodes the threshold should probably be higher
though.

While I like the idea of a self-tuning scheduler, when combined with
this new sched_domain algorithm it's hard to tell if the tuning or the
algorithm is at fault when we get results we don't like. Have you done
much running with the auto-tuning turned off, using the old values,
to see the impact (positive or negative) that just the new algorithm has?

Rick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.111 / U:1.840 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site