![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Yep. I've argued for fairness here, and that is presently what
we get. Between nodes the threshold should probably be higher
though.
While I like the idea of a self-tuning scheduler, when combined with
this new sched_domain algorithm it's hard to tell if the tuning or the
algorithm is at fault when we get results we don't like. Have you done
much running with the auto-tuning turned off, using the old values,
to see the impact (positive or negative) that just the new algorithm has?
Rick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00 [W:0.782 / U:0.650 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||