![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Joel Becker wrote: > This reads: "all of the specified effects of the other call, > or none of them." [...] > Of course, that doesn't change the possible race updating > f_pos at the end of each thread's call. Hmm, "all, but the f_pos read-modify-write" sounds more like how an insurance company would define "all" :-) What's puzzling here is that the standard would introduce such an important concept in the discussion of threads. - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:00 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||